Q&A with Mayoral Candidates

So you want to be Mayor?

The Chamber wants to know where Greater Victoria's mayoral candidates stand on issues of importance to the business community. We've asked candidates six questions, including one on behalf of our community partners at Destination Greater Victoria. Results are posted below, and will be updated as candidates respond.
For a list of all candidates running in B.C.'s 2018 local election, including councillors, go to: elections.bc.ca.

District of Saanich

Richard Atwell (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

Yes. While Saanich was historically a bedroom community with its municipal revenues generated mainly from residential property taxes, it is at the forefront of a development phase that will see the revitalization of its many village centres. Uptown, University Heights and the rest of the Shelbourne Valley, etc. Redevelopment in these areas will increase the commercial base and provide an opportunity to narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes. In addition, an increase in the number of residential units in these areas will also generate much income for the municipality to help offset costs that are currently being borne by businesses at their higher rate of taxation.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Yes. Delivering a first-class transportation system for this region is a collective priority for all levels of government while at the same time lacking authority at the local government level to deliver it. Even the vital train corridor belongs to a non-profit agency that lacks adequate funding. As the designated authority over the transit system, ferry and highway system, the Provincial Government must either deliver substantial improvements or restructure this arrangement to create a new independent authority as municipalities are merely the local road authorities. Dollars spent on major infrastructure have been concentrated in the lower mainland to improve transportation and spur economic growth over the last 10 years and have been paid for in part by our own taxes. I believe that we need to apply pressure on the government redirect those taxes into local infrastructure projects and work toward establishing an authority that can permanently redirect taxes. .

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Yes. Specifically, the proposal on the Victoria and Saanich municipal ballots is directed at studying for the first time the pros and cons of amalgamating these two municipalities. With regional planning and transportation challenges affecting affordability and quality of life, Greater Victoria is struggling with growing pains as it becomes a major metropolitan region. Efforts to gather the necessary data to make an informed decision has long been held back by political self-interest. This is one the reasons why I am proud to have pushed for and participated in the formulation of an arm-length process where citizens of both communities will decide. This is an exciting development and I hope that citizens in both municipalities will vote in favour of establishing an assembly that will put the power of decision making into their hands.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Municipalities play a critical role in the rezoning and development approval process. The old saying, "lead, follow or get out of the way" couldn't apply more to the municipal role. Municipalities must lead by working with all stakeholders, thinking boldly about the future of the municipality and planning for its inevitable growth. Councils must also lead by setting expectations, clearly defined priorities and eliminating conflicts between policies. This will ensure success for the community over the next 10-30 years when a large portion of the existing housing stock from the 1950 - 1970’s will be replaced. Finally, Planning Departments must utilize best practices and reduce the time required for applications to reach council. Delays experienced in this process, compounded by inflationary construction costs, have the greatest impact on affordability and must be reduced.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

For the first time in 16 years, we have elected seven Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) who presently hold the reigns of government. Each MLA lives in this region and has for a long time. They are intimately familiar with the challenges we face as a community, especially with regard to transportation. I believe that uniting these MLAs behind the common cause of solving our local issues is paramount and by gaining their support and commitment, local governments will demonstrate the leadership necessary to transcend party lines.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes.

Fred Haynes (councillor incumbent) — Has not yet responded to questions

David Shebib — Has not yet responded to questions

Rob Wickson Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

In Saanich the ratio between business and residential property taxes are significant. This might be seen as reason why businesses prefer to locate in other communities. If this is truly a factor, then we must close the gap to attract more economic development to Saanich.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

This is an interesting question. I have long called for our regional transportation to be a priority and I took part in the CRD’s Regional Growth Strategy in 2008 to help develop transportation planning. It has been disappointing that we have not made any significant progress. A Regional Transportation Authority is badly needed but unless every municipality buys into it we will not be able to respond to new transportation developments which will revolutionize mobility choices and have a significant impact on how we adapt our road infrastructure. Is the CRD’s current governance model able to address regional transportation? The citizens who want improved regional transportation services have not been given a voice in the matter. I would recommend that we need to look at having a directly elected Chair and Board. Failing that, it may be necessary to look at a TransLink model. In order to protect land use patterns from becoming disjointed resulting in more traffic congestion, wasted travel times, further environmental degradation not to mention increases emergency services and in health care costs related to car crashes The VRTC is responsible for bus transit. An enormous amount of faith is being placed on Bus Rapid Transit to be the solution to traffic congestion. Again, in implementing BRT we have failed to consider the transportation developments coming online - electric vehicles, car sharing and autonomous vehicles etc. We also need to see transportation as part of a regional climate action strategy. So, it is not easy to answer this question directly because we have in fact responded in a piecemeal fashion and taken steps backward in planning transportation.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Yes, this question has been on my radar since I was the incoming president of the Victoria Chamber of Commerce in 1999. It is about time to ask the right questions and gather the evidence that will put this question to bed. I make my decisions based on evidence and would like to see all of the evidence before deciding what the best answer might be.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Efficient transportation choices and employer incentives that will ease the cost burden of travel. For example why is there not a 24hr bus service along the main corridors? Many cities have this service. I have long advocated an urban rail/tram/LRT system along the Douglas St Corridor and believe that we need to look again at bringing forward what the citizens voted for in 2011. An urban rail system combined with land use development will create opportunities to build affordable housing close to transit links. Further, in order to have stable rents, we must have a vacancy rate that results in more competition between landlords. Keeping and attracting a labour force has become a major obstacle for business expansion. For example, as an owner of a small Janitorial business, I am reluctant to seek new clients because of the difficulty in finding labour even though I pay significantly more than minimum wages. Simply put, we must build substantially more housing of all types but particularly workforce rental housing near transportation alternatives.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

Relationships between all levels of government must be built on mutual respect and must be focused on results not political divisions. As an independent collaborative leader I would bring the skills a learned as the President of the Victoria Chamber and Chair of the BC Chamber of Commerce to this issue.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

This is a question that needs broad community support. I would be pleased to have those conversations that seek support for one of our major economic drivers.

City of Victoria

Saul Anderson — Has not yet responded to questions

Michael Geoghegan Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

For about 20 years businesses paid taxes at about 2.5 times the residential rate now it is at about 3.5 to one. I would like to over time reeduce it down to 3.0 to one. Also as Mayor I will follow the lead of Langford and replace annual business licenses with a one time fee.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Yes Why? Traffic into the downtown core is down while congestion is up. Relocating bike lanes to secondary roads will help as will synchronizing street lights. But it is better if that synchronization extends across our parochial local municipal boundaries. Regional transpsortation planning will also help as well as getting the provincial government to build the long overdue Malahat bypass.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Yes Why? Having within the CRD a population of less than Burnaby split into 13 different municipalities is insane. A good start is amalagamating Victoria and Saanich. Any amalagamation should be subject to a binding referendum vote.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Rescidn the Step Code and significantly improve decision making timelines in Victoria. These two actions will redcue the cost of new housing by $150,000 per unit. I will also lobby the province to build 3,000 to 5,000 new units of housing at UVic and Camosun thus freeing up a similar number of rental units in Victoria, Saanich and Oak Bay. This will help stabilise rents in the region.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

As a lobbyist I already enjoy a positive relationship with both the federal and provincial governments as well as their respective opposition parties. My consulting website provides ample proof of this: http://www.mgcltd.ca/photogallery/index.php As Mayor I am very confident of my ability to improve the relationship and influence of Victoria with both levels of government.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes I do. As a former Ministerial Assistant to the Minister of Small Business, Tourism and Culture I am well aware of the importance of tourism marketing. I would also endevour to improve our cruise ship terminal facilities so as to entice more people to come off the ship and spend money here.

Stephen Hammond Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

A major goal for me and our NewCouncil.ca team is to be fiscally responsible. That’s why we asked for an audit of the Johnson Bridge before going forward with the next massive capital project of the Crystal Pool. Since 2012 all taxes, property and business taxes have gone up more than double the rate of inflation. If I have a willing council, I will ensure all taxes do not exceed the rate of inflation, and it’s our wish to be less than that. It’s our desire to institute zero based budgeting (starting with some key departments) and to look at ways to spend money on core city services, not pet projects. As such, I won’t make promises I/we can’t keep. If we can find a way to lower taxes for businesses and home owners, we will.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

The only way we’re going to get more people out of their cars is by offering them alternatives so they think, “I’m better off on that bus, than being stuck in traffic.” But that’s tough to do because people who have cars, like their cars and the convenience. I will work with the Victoria Regional Transit Commission to take a truly regional approach to transit, allowing for people to come into our city and for Victorians to leave our city with more ease. It’s not enough to have silos when it comes to transit: we have to work together as a region. Inside the city, there are other big issues, due to the congestion, difficulty for persons with mobility issues and the lack of parking. All those need improvement.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Yes. This takes a political issue out of the hands of politicians, to come up with better ideas for amalgamation. We presume there will be savings and improvements with amalgamation, but that information will only come from studying the process, looking for the best result.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

I was so pleased to hear Catherine Holt tell the Our Place candidates forum last night that business is willing to allow their tax dollars (spent wisely) on affordable housing. She explained to the crowd that there is a difference between real estate as an investment – which in Victoria is out of reach of most people – and affordable housing. Most of these initiatives come from the provincial and federal governments, along with the CRD. However, the City can help with zoning, and grants for non-profit housing societies. BC Housing is already taking bold steps to help people out and I want to work with them to continue doing so. My partner, Jack Boomer and I are so fortunate to have a home we love and can afford. We realize some of that has come from being born at the right time. It’s not fair that younger people, born later, are finding a real estate boom they can’t be part of. I will work to help them have affordable housing.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

The first people I would talk to once elected are the Premier of BC and the island cabinet ministers and the ministers involved in areas of interest to Victoria and our region. Then I’d call up the various federal cabinet ministers to talk about common interests. I’ve been around politics all my life and have learned that regardless of political stripe, everyone who goes into public service does it for the right reason – they want to improve the lives of their constituents. Also, my career is based on the importance of communication and having frank and honest conversations with people. I’ll continue doing that as mayor. We may live on an island, but we’re not an island when it comes to getting things done (ok, that’s a bit corny, but you get the idea).

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes.

Lisa Helps (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

This year, in fact, we reversed a 20-year trend of charging business class more than 2.5 times the tax rate paid by residential owners. While the overall property tax increase this year was set at 2.62% (in line with our goal of keeping tax increases to the inflation rate plus 1%), the share split was adjusted to yield a 4% increase from residential owners but only 1.1% more from businesses.. Had the share been split using the previous formula, the business new business tax rate would have been approximately 3.69 times the residential rate. Going forward, I will continue to apply our zero-based budgeting approach and pursue our efforts to develop alternative revenue sources beyond property taxes and utility fees.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Absolutely yes. As we observe the growing congestion on our major streets and on Highways 1 and 17, it is clear that we must take serious measures now, or face much larger problems and greater expense down the road. And if re-elected, I will move to have Victoria take on a larger leadership role on the Victoria Regional Transit Commission so together, we can build a transit system for the future, including rapid transit lanes from the city to the Westshore and back, with the aim of decreasing traffic congestion and increasing parking availability in the city. The Victoria Regional Transit Commission is an example of what can work governance-wise with regard to transportation in the region as there is regional representation without one representative from each local government. This means that we show up at the table with the whole region in mind.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Yes! For years, many Victoria residents and City Council have been clear in their support for a more efficient regional governance model, including the latest proposal put forward to form a citizens’ assembly to study the amalgamation of Saanich and Victoria. I support this initiative. It is my firm view that for any amalgamation initiative to succeed, it will first have to be demonstrated that a majority of residents in both jurisdictions have a clear understanding of the terms of an agreement to amalgamate. Having meaningful citizen involvement at the outset is not only prudent but also necessary. My platform “Commitment: I will be bound by the recommendation of the Citizens Assembly” (https://lisahelpsvictoria.ca/were-all-in-this-together/#together-step4) lays out my plan should the ballot question on the Citizens Assembly pass. This includes a potential referendum on amalgamation in advance of the 2022 election (if recommended by the Citizens Assembly).

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Thanks to our successful effort over the past four years to obtain financial support from all three levels of government, we are now in a position to start tackling this issue in earnest. Our “Bold Action on Housing” plan intends to build at least 2,000 units of new, affordable homes in the region, including at least 400 units (20% of total) renting at $375 a month, 620 units (31% of total) at Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation rates, and 980 units (49% of total) at between 85% to 95% of current rental rates. This is housing for working people. We will also implement a Community Amenity Contribution policy that is fair and creates affordable rental units in new condo buildings. Other initiatives include allowing larger garden suite units for families on larger lots; moveable tiny homes in backyards at rents no more than $500 a month and lastly, to work with the community to develop a Community land Trust program where residents can pool existing properties to create a speculation free zones.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

When elected in 2014 the first phone call I made was to the Premier’s office. My message was, “How can we find alignment and work together?” Likewise, after the Trudeau government was elected and the mandate letters published, I looked for alignment between the mandates of ministers and the city and region. I’ve made several trips to Ottawa to advance the city’s and the region’s interests and have a very strong relationship with the federal government. When we work together as a region, senior levels of government are more likely to come to the table. One example is the South Island Prosperity Project and the application to the federal Smart Cities Challenge; we’ve been shortlisted for a $10 million prize to address transportation in the region. Working together as a region we were also able to secure $60 million in housing funding to match our regional contribution of $30 million.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Absolutely yes. In this past term, the City of Victoria and Destination Greater Victoria worked collaboratively to remove the City’s grandfathered status and to make Destination Greater Victoria the eligible entity to collect the MRDT. Through this negotiation the City also handed over responsibility for the sales and marketing of the Victoria Conference Centre to Destination Greater Victoria. Destination Greater Victoria presented a solid five year business case to the City which demonstrated their ambition and commitment with this new arrangement. The new relationship is working well; the MRDT is a key funding source to promote tourism sales and marketing. I’m thrilled with the new work that’s happening as a result of this new relationship include events like the Impact Sustainable Tourism Conference and Capital City Comicon to name just a few.

David Arthur Johnston — Has not yet responded to questions

Sean Leitenberg Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

Yes I will as the cost of business property taxes only raises the cost of operating a business and as a result increases the cost of everyday services and basic needs. The additional stress on the financing of small business makes it difficult for a start up or local business to succeed. Many businesses are also un from home now and this would help narrow the gab between those who work from home or a rented office.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Yes I do I believe the municipalities must work together to create a better regional transit system getting people into the city including free bas service from the downtown to parking areas for cars and buses just outside the core. This service should be frequent and reliable.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Yes I do as major decisions like this need as much public input as possible. A citizens assembly will increase the discussion and allow the public to have is voice.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

I would implement housing strategies that would force the creation of affordable rentals. My 20-20-20 plan would require that all new developments include 20% of the new units at 20% below market rent for the next 20 years. Developers could choose to pay into a fund if they choose not to create the rentals in the new development and the city could use these funds to incentives other developments to create the units. We will help the developers achieve the desired housing through density and height variances where appropriate.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

Better communication. As someone who has spent the last 5 years dealing with both the Provincial and Federal Finance departments I would make sure regional issues are brought to the attention of the other levels of government and commitments of action are made regardless of party politics. Political parties will come and go on the Provincial and Federal level we need to make sure Victoria is taken care of regardless of who is in power.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes I do. The tourism industry is very competitive on a global level and we need to make sure Victoria’s tourism industry continues to grow and bring much needed jobs and dollars to our city.

Bruce McGuigan Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

Yes. The disparity in mill rates between residential and non-residential property in Victoria is one of the greatest in British Columbia. Residential property tax is a huge source of provincial revenue, however, rates are managed to allow people to own property – a fundamental economic pillar. Business is an equally critical pillar. There is nothing to gain by creating taxation policy for non-residential property owners that become the sole reason that many –often smaller-- businesses are forced to close. Big business is great, but smaller business determines the character of a community.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

I do, because it is a regional issue. Along with public consultation, I will work with the Capital Regional District, BC transit and the provincial government to create an integrated public transportation system that is effective to encourage public transportation usage, but not to the detriment of other modalities of transport. Public transportation must also embrace cleaner energy sources going forward. We can build a better bike work for less money than Victoria has seen in the last couple of years in , without removing parking in front of small businesses and appropriating parts of the infrastructural budget at the expense of road repairs.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

A Citizen’s Assembly does not have the authority to effect the legislative change required to amend municipal borders; this would ultimately rest with the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. I do support the notion of public input and education on the concept of amalgamation however. If and when our city and this region decide to move in this direction, steps must be managed incrementally and in a way that ensures the best results for the greatest number, and not simply advantages for the few.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

The city must take the lead and petition other levels of government to assist by providing the resources and financial and legal tools to create permanent, income appropriate housing for non-property owning workers in Victoria. We can do this by building on city-owned land, and by petitioning other levels of government to provide land. Rents could be applied in an income appropriate manner to assist tenants. If 25% is rented at market rates and the remaining 75% at income appropriate levels, we can subsidize lower paying tenants. Amortized carefully, housing becomes a city asset in a relatively short space of time. It must also be reasonably available. It isn’t a solution if we build 20 units every year any more than it is to build 200 that people cannot afford to live in. Someone earning the average wage in this city should be able to live in an average level of accommodation.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

I would begin by ensuring that the city council, as a local government, focuses on local issues, manages resources responsibly and acts as an accountable partner. Intergovernmental relationships are like business relations. When you need business funding, you provide a plan to prove the numbers work, that there is a demand for what you intend to provide and that you are a good risk. Working with other levels of government is similar. Regionally shared costs reduce the risk and increase scope more than duplicated services in a small geographic area. If we want funding from the province or the federal government, then we need to be very clear about what it is for and manage it accordingly if we expect to receive anything. How can we not know the final cost of the new bridge that has created controversy for most of the last decade? That let it isn’t finished and the current mayor is calling for an independent audit weeks before the election, instead of four years ago when she took office is unacceptable.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes – and no. While this program provides funding – and who doesn’t like the idea of secure, long-term funding – all systems should be expected to change as the market does. That being said, the recent move to apply revenue generated from the MRDT systems to support initiatives such as affordable housing may be noble in intent, but I believe such funding needs to come from another part of the budget. Tourism is a major industry in our city and the province, and provides benefits beyond our cities limits to nearby communities. In an increasingly competitive market, we need to keep our edge. We may wish to reassess the way the 3% of short term accommodation revenues are used within the tourism industry, but it doesn’t make sense to fund issues of social policy with it.

Ryan Moen Click for this candidate's Q&A

Alexander Schmid — Has not yet responded to questions

Krysztof Zmuda — Has not yet responded to questions

City of Langford

Robert Fraser — Has not yet responded to questions

Stewart Young (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

In 2017 Council embarked upon a 10-year program to reduce the tax burden on businesses by reducing the tax rate by 0.05 per year so that by the end of this process the business tax rate will be fair.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

In the last 10 years the City of Langford has spent over 65 million dollars on improving transportation networks in Langford. I strongly believe municipalities must use their tax dollars to improve transportation networks within their boundaries and be careful not to pay for regional transportation infrastructure improvements that are the responsibility of the province who already tax for these services.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Langford has one of the lowest tax rates in the Capital region, therefore taxes would go up if we amalgamated. The only way I would consider amalgamation is if financial accountability and efficient management of red tape and bureaucracy can be guaranteed and Langford’s taxes do not go up.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Langford builds the most affordable housing in the region. Langford is known as one of the most progressive cities in Canada as it offers a wide range of housing options that are more affordable than housing in the other cities in the region. Langford believes strongly in supply and demand and has shown that increased supply helps to keep housing prices down. Over the last eight years Langford has built over 2,900 affordable residential rental units, some of these have been through partnerships with organizations such as M’akola and Pacifica Housing and the development community.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

The City of Langford is strongly against senior government downloading their responsibilities on to municipalities. We need the two senior governments to commit to giving back some of the tax dollars collected from Langford residents in the form of grants for important infrastructure projects. Langford has not received a significant grant from a senior government in over three years.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Absolutely! Langford is working hard to become recognized as the sports tourism destination and centre of sports excellence in British Columbia. It is home to several national teams and athletes, many of whom are Olympic-bound. Langford has entered into a number of partnerships that has resulted in world-class recreational facilities which are used by both residents and athletes of all levels. Every year Langford hosts a number of national and international events that has put Langford on the map and attracts visitors and tourists to the region which helps to strengthen the local economy.

District of Oak Bay

Nils Jensen (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

The bulk of Oak Bay’s tax levy — approximately 95% — comes from residential property taxes. Business accounts for 5%. In the 2018 budget the Business/Residential ratio was 2.54. A long standing policy dictates that tax ratios are set so that any tax increases are equalized between the various property classes. At a ratio 2.54, Oak Bay has one of the lower ratios in the CRD and in BC. This relatively narrow gap between business and residential has been maintained for many years.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Yes, I strongly support a regional approach to transportation. At the CRD I supported the creation of a transportation authority under the auspices of the CRD - unfortunately there was insufficient support at the board table. Transportation is a key economic driver for any growing region. Without centralized planning and delivery many opportunities for funding from senior levels of government are lost.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

No, I do not support a citizens’ assembly process. Oak Bay residents rejected amalgamation by a clear majority in the 2014 referendum and a subsequent survey showed no change in that position. Oak Bay Council has effective tools for listening to and communicating with Oak Bay residents. We continue to monitor citizens’ views and if there should be a significant change in future, we would address it.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Creating affordable housing is a challenge in Oak Bay as we are a fully built out community with high land values. Having said that there some strategies for providing affordable and attainable housing: - regulating secondary suites - using public lands for housing options - working with local non-profit organizations to encourage affordable housing - encouraging developers to take advantage of the new federal rental financing program

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

A strong and open relationship with provincial and federal governments is a clear advantage to economic well-being. For municipalities, such a relationship is best established through the CRD. There have been significant projects where cooperation between CRD and senior levels of government has proven very beneficial. For instance the federal and provincial government’s made very significant contributions to sewage treatment (~$500 million) and housing (~$60 million). Having a standing direction to staff to seek out beneficial partnerships is the best way forward, as is ongoing contact by the Chair of the CRD

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes. Tourism is a critical component of our region’s economy. Supporting tourism is essential to the well-being of the CRD.

Kevin Murdoch (councillor incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

No. We have a consistent multiplier (around 2.5x) that is one of the lowest in BC. Our rates are adjusted so the average percentage increase is absorbed by both residential and businesses equally – this systems has worked well for years (and less than 5% of taxes are paid by businesses).

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Yes. A regional transportation authority makes sense – but the governance model needs to be established first. The CRD has too many expensive departments that write reports but don’t have jurisdiction – transportation is one of those areas. Before any funding is provided, there needs to be agreement between the Province, municipalities, and the CRD to delegate the authority to do the work to the agency so assigned.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

I think the citizens’ assembly (CA) model is the only one that would work unless the province steps in to help with a process. The key to a good discussion on amalgamation (or any complex issue with many possible models and outcomes) is to have tangible, clear options on the table for analysis. The CA model is, I believe, one of the best ways of achieving this goal. It’s good to remember that 40% of Oak Bay supported amalgamation in the last referendum question – and it was a clear question on amalgamation. Not a majority, but too high a percentage to not be at the table when discussions are going on.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Oak Bay needs to complete the OCP and put in place clear development regulations. Over the last four years without regulation we have seen haphazard decision making on large projects that scare both developers and residents alike – while blocking any innovative infill housing options. Oak Bay is the only municipality whose population has shrunk over the last 50 years – we need to find housing that meets the community needs so people start moving back in and our businesses can flourish.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

I would include First Nations in this list of governments as well. Always be open an honest in our dealings – and seek solutions that work for all parties so it’s easy for everyone to say yes.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes.

District of Esquimalt

Barb Desjardines (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

I am supportive of narrowing the gap between business and residential property taxes and bring forward this option to council each year during budget. As a business person I understand the challenges facing small businesses and how taxes reduce ability to pay better wages, to provide benefits, or to take home a decent living wage for yourself. The challenge is that this is not the perception of those that have not been in their own business. The education of elected officials as to the realities of having your own business needs to be done throughout the term.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

I absolutely support a regional transit authority that can have all the players at the table.Currently we have the Province looking after highways, BC Ferries water transit, BC Transit handling buses (but their mandate also includes rail), CRD looking after trails, The Island Corridor managing the E&N corridor, and municipalities looking after local roads. I support a Translink model of governance for our region to coordinate regional transportation and with input from municipal officials on strategic priorities. Until we have someone looking out for the integration of all transportation in the region, we cannot meet the goals for good and well planned transportation around our region

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

The ultimate responsibility of governance within communities and the region is the responsibility of the Province. The Community Charter and the Local Government Act lay out the rules and regulations well. Times change and our Charter and Act should have a review process built into them. A review policy could be developed both for emerging issues and for overall review and I would suggest that a 10 year period would capture change and the need for change without allowing the documents to become irrelevant or out dated. The Provincial government has many mechanisms by which it could do this and UBCM would be a major source of commentary for updating. I am a strong proponent of public inclusion and I would support public input in a meaningful and significant manner. My concern regarding citizens assembly is the complexity of the governance and the base knowledge of citizens regarding their local and regional governance system. There is a strong positive for citizen assembly in some form in that it can also provide education and understanding of governance to the public who participate.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

As Mayor I will continue to work to ensure development processes move forward within reasonable time frames, and to provide consistency within these processes. When developers know what the municipal expectations are, projects can move fairly quickly through municipal approvals. The Esquimalt community want developers to be partners within the community, and to know , understand and participate in the community. Esquimalt Official Community Plan sets out guidelines for variety of housing and housing affordability.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

Regional prioritization of key initiatives with common voice would provide a clear message to both provincial and federal governments. This could allow communities to work together rather than be set up to compete with each other in securing funding or assistance from other governments.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Esquimalt participates in and contributes to Destination Greater Victoria (formerly Tourism Victoria) and have over the past 4 years increased our connection and activity through this organization. We all benefit through common marketing of the region and as Esquimalt locally gains more tourism opportunities I will advocate for our support for the marketing of these be supported. Please keep each of your answers to less than 150 words. We will post the questions, and your responses as we receive them, on our website at VictoriaChamber.ca. The results will be promoted through our weekly newsletter, which reaches more than 3,000 engaged readers in Greater Victoria’s business community.

John Roe Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

We have a serious underground infrastructure issue in Esquimalt, Leaky, rotten, polluting storm and sanitary sewers, best guess $70 million ++, no engineering reports on the the problem. Yes I will do my best, we are a small commercial / industrial base, my goal is to increase by densification industrial / commercial to increase our tax base and reduce the pressure on our current commercial tax payers.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

Yes I do, but for Esquimalt we have not invested in our rotten, leaking, polluting in-ground infrastructure replacement and repairs, if elected, once the Engineering Study, Modeling and a finical plan and timeline in place, so no without this information we are spending a dime, external of what there is legislated agreement.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Yes I am, it's a process that needs to be discussed, not at only in the political realm, but the community needs the facts, in infrastructure in-ground and above ( what we own ), audited report showing what we have and the projected costs in the future. With this audit a cost analysis of the potential savings or otherwise in Amalgamation and or integration, example, sewer / storm sewers, roads, parks etc. The current Capital Regional District Board consists of municipal councilors and mayors who are appointed 1 from the 13 municipalities. By legislation, these municipal appointments are responsible to represent the interests of their home municipalities. 2 Do you think that regional interests would be better served if the entire CRD Board was directly elected by voters region-wide? Why or why not? Please explain. Yes, but we would need to have some type of the Ward system for the regions, currently the Mayor and or Councilor, is so overwhelmed by the roles they play, the communication of decisions made at the table when presented at council, are watered down or not discussed in detail. So I guess my question is the model proposed like Saanich, elected to council elected to CRD?

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

Yes I do have a plan for Esquimalt, I have spent my life here in our region, working successfully on P3's between, Industry, Government and Non_Government agencies, always think out of the box, so it's a bigge , a story and a solution. https://www.facebook.com/282186229264347/photos/a.282264385923198/290187101797593/?type=3&theater

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

You should also include first nations in the question, nothing can go forward in our region without consultation. I have a long history of working with all levels of government, as an example the cleanup of the Harbour and Gorge Waterway Watershed involved heavy industry, 6 municipalities, 4 first nations, provincial, federal government and four separate elected political stripes , brought everyone to the table, came up with a plan and sourced hundreds of millions of private and public dollars, work and partnerships continue to this day. 18 agencies involved in the management of our Gorge Waterway / Victoria Harbour Watershed. and we did it swimmable waters in Our Gorge Waterway and Victoria Harbour, by the year 2000. Currently working in partnership with heavy industry, first nation, federal and provincial government, local government and private citizens on removal and disposal of Dead Boats from out shorelines , BC wide.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

No when I see a line item in this proposal of financial support for the ongoing maintenance of our Parks, Beaches communities, for paid employees I will support. As a long term conservationist involved in cleanup and remove of hundreds of thousand of tons of garbage , dead boats this list goes on. I am out in the water most days on our beaches and parks, they are all looking worn out tired, garbage, cigarette butts grrr , every person I talk to in this community is at the point of being rude to our guest. We can't be Disney Land of the north without providing for planning, maintenance housing, us old volunteers are tired of cleaning up the mess, put money to paid, planning repairs and maintenance BC wide, basically a head tax for every person visiting. If there is no housing and business are going bring seasonal workers, business would and should pay. Worked heavy construction for years in camps all over Canada and the projects paid and provided housing and food or we just didn't work. .

City of Colwood

Carol Hamilton (incumbent) — Has not yet responded to questions

Rob Martin (councillor incumbent) — Has not yet responded to questions

District of Central Saanich

Ryan Windsor (elected by acclamation) — Has not yet responded to questions

District of Sooke

Kevin Pearson — Has not yet responded to questions

Mick Rhodes — Has not yet responded to questions

Maja Tait (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

In my second term as mayor, I will encourage more commercial development (retail, office and light industrial) to narrow this gap. Increasing the commercial base will lessen the burden on both the residential and commercial tax bases. Specifically, I will • encourage local businesses to flourish • invite appropriate businesses to re-locate here • provide educational support for home-based businesses that want to grow their online presence • raise awareness how the Maker Space at EMCS Community School can serve as a resource for local businesses Why? A proactive approach to growing our local businesses is important for the well-being of everyone in Sooke. Supporting local business development grows the commercial tax base which creates employment and can keep residential taxes low.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

We have a regional model already in place and I am a Director of the Victoria Regional Transit Commission. I think a more coordinated effort would improve the transit experience for commuters, visitors, in fact, for everyone. Real Time Transit bus tracking will support this goal. So would a regional approach to the implementation of more dedicated bus lanes. I also support the Transit Future Plan which will include four layers of transit service tailored to regional and local community needs: • rapid transit • frequent transit • local transit • targeted services

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

Internationally tested, a citizens’ assembly is a model that can reduce politics, increase grassroots citizen involvement, and minimize self-interest. A citizens’ assembly approach was recently used on Vancouver Island to address amalgamation of Duncan and Cowichan. I would ask Sooke Council to consider using such an approach to the question of amalgamation in greater Victoria. The decision to use a citizens’ assembly approach would have to be supported by each of the municipalities and should be reflective of the demographic and socio-economic complexity of the region.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

It is critical that purpose-built affordable rental accommodation be high on the priority list for Sooke, and for all municipalities. A regional strategy makes sense, including: • Building the right supply of housing in Sooke to support the work force, using an evidence based approach • Participating in a shared regional response to present and future housing demand • Protecting and maintaining existing rental stock, both market and non-market • Encourage a regionally coordinated response to support employees to be able to live near their work • Partnerships with not-for-profit agencies are currently being developed to plan for and construct purpose built rental accommodation in Sooke.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

I am currently the first vice President of the Union of British Columbia Municipalities, the common voice for local government in BC. Improving relationships among municipalities was a consideration that motivated me to intensify my involvement with UBCM in 2016. I believe it is very important to establish good working relations between municipalities and provincial government, particularly in the areas of health care and transportation. Through UBCM, I work to encourage opportunities for local government to share experiences, be represented on provincial committees, work together, and influence provincial decisions.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

In 2018 Council provided funding to our local organizations to conduct a study to review and recommend. I’m looking forward to the discussions on their findings.

Town of Sidney

Cliff McNeil-Smith — Has not yet responded to questions

Steve Price (incumbent) Click for this candidate's Q&A

District of North Saanich

Dorothy Hartshorne Click for this candidate's Q&A

Question 1: Will you narrow the gap between business and residential property taxes? Why?

It is the responsibility of local government to promote economic development because a healthy community needs a good mix of business operations, particularly small and medium sized local businesses. I will endeavour to reduce the taxes businesses need to pay because sound community economics are supported by making a good environment for business to flourish.

Question 2: Do you support improving transportation in Greater Victoria through a regional approach to governance, funding, planning and delivery? Why?

All the municipalities in the CRD need to work together to develop an integrated transit plan that addresses current congestion problems and plans for an energy efficient future.

Question 3: Do you support a citizens’ assembly process that empowers the public to decide whether to reduce the number of municipalities in our region? Why?

If it was at no cost to the residents of North Saanich. Information is a necessary component of reasoned decision making.

Question 4: Businesses in Greater Victoria are having trouble attracting and retaining employees due to the lack of affordable and attainable housing. What would you do to help solve this problem?

North Saanich is currently in the process of developing an Affordable Housing strategy and I would see the strategy through to fruition. I believe that diverse neighbourhoods are an essential part of a healthy community, so I would work with our neighbouring municipalities to provide housing within reach options for all residents.

Question 5: What would you do to improve the relationship between municipalities in our region with the provincial and federal governments?

Take every opportunity to develop strong collaborative relationships with both federal MP’s and provincial MLA’s and their staff.

Question 6: Do you support secure and long term funding for tourism marketing and sales through the MRDT system?

Yes. Tourism is one of the most important economic drivers in BC..

Geoff Orr (councillor incumbent) — Has not yet responded to questions

Town of View Royal

David Screech (elected by acclamation) — Has not yet responded to questions

District of Metchosin

John Ranns (elected by acclamation) — Has not yet responded to questions

District of Highlands

Ken Williams (elected by acclamation) — Has not yet responded to questions

Oct. 20, 2018 Local ElectionsMayoral Candidate Q&A